Legal Expert: Why The Janel Grant vs. Vince McMahon Lawsuit May End Before Trial

One Big Thing

Dave Meltzer reports the Janel Grant lawsuit against Vince McMahon could be moved to arbitration, potentially preventing a public trial. The case hinges on the enforcement of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) signed by Grant.

Why It Matters

The outcome of this legal battle could set a precedent for how sexual misconduct cases involving NDAs are handled in the wrestling industry and corporate America.

Key Details

• McMahon and WWE’s lawyers filed motions to move the case to arbitration
• John Laurinaitis has aligned with McMahon’s legal position
• The defense argues Grant violated her NDA by filing the lawsuit

By The Numbers

• Grant filed the lawsuit in January 2024
• The NDA reportedly involved a $3 million payment
• Three defendants named: McMahon, Laurinaitis, and WWE

Expert Analysis

Meltzer points to two possible outcomes:

• Most likely: Case moves to private arbitration based on NDA terms
• Less likely: Judge allows trial to proceed based on public interest

Direct Quote

The legal system very much protects the rich guys, not always but usually,” Meltzer said on Wrestling Observer Radio. “Based on the wording of the law, the judge is going to have a very compelling argument to throw it out.”

What’s Next

A judge will review the motion to move the case to arbitration. The decision will determine if the allegations receive a public hearing or move to private proceedings.

What do you think about the role of NDAs in sexual misconduct cases? Share your thoughts in the comments below.