One Big Thing
WWE executive Paul Heyman believes too many championships can dilute their significance in professional wrestling, emphasizing the need for proper time and focus on existing titles.
Key Details
- Heyman confirmed he opposed adding a men’s mid-card title during his tenure as SmackDown Head Writer
- He stressed that championships need adequate TV time to maintain relevance
- The comments come as WWE introduces new Women’s Intercontinental and United States Championships
Direct Quote
“I’m not a big fan of a multitude of titles, unless you can give them enough time,” Heyman told CBS Sports’ Shakiel Mahjouri.
By The Numbers
- WWE currently features multiple championships across RAW and SmackDown
- Two new women’s championships added in recent weeks
Why It Matters
Heyman’s perspective raises important questions about title saturation in professional wrestling, particularly as WWE expands its championship lineup. His comments suggest a potential disconnect between expansion and meaningful storytelling.
The Bottom Line
Heyman advocates for a practical approach: championships should only exist if they can be made relevant and meaningful to viewers. The success of new titles will depend on WWE’s ability to give them proper attention and storyline significance.
What’s Next?
How will WWE balance its growing number of championships while maintaining their prestige? Share your thoughts in the comments below.