One big thing: WWE sidelines Bobby Lashley despite his prime condition
Former WWE star MVP criticizes the company’s decision to limit Bobby Lashley’s television appearances, questioning the logic behind removing him from the title picture.
Why it matters
• Lashley’s absence impacts WWE’s star power and potential storylines
• Raises questions about WWE’s talent utilization strategy
• Highlights the ongoing debate about balancing veteran presence with promoting younger talent
By the numbers
• Lashley is 48 years old
• Triple H retired at 49 or 50, according to MVP
What they’re saying
MVP on Lashley’s condition:
“He still looks better than everybody on the roster. He’s in better shape than everybody on the roster. He can literally kick everybody’s ass on the roster.”
The big picture
• WWE’s focus on younger talent may be overshadowing valuable veteran contributions
• Lashley’s absence could be a missed opportunity for elevating new stars through high-profile matches
• The decision raises concerns about WWE’s long-term booking strategy
Between the lines
• MVP suggests Lashley could fill the role left by Brock Lesnar’s absence
• Comparisons to “Black Brock” underscore Lashley’s unique appeal and marketability
What’s next
• Uncertainty surrounds Lashley’s future in WWE
• Speculation about potential AEW interest in Lashley continues
The bottom line
WWE’s decision to sideline Bobby Lashley has sparked debate about the company’s talent management and long-term planning. As the wrestling landscape evolves, the balance between showcasing veterans and nurturing new talent remains a critical challenge for promotions.
What do you think about WWE’s handling of Bobby Lashley? Is the company missing out on a valuable asset, or is this the right move for the future? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
